Child support reforms
'unfair'
Commentary from MRA:
Canberra Times article "Child
support reforms 'unfair'"
DSS document - Policy &
Legislation
Some of the child support reforms brought in last year, were supposed to
relieve a little of the financial pressure on paying parents and ensure they
had some input into how the maintenance was spent by allowing them to claim
up to 25% of the periodic maintenance as direct payments to a third party
for the benefit of their children.
These amounts claimed did not need the approval of the other parent.
The change was welcomed, but we are now seeing the unfair limitations that
the Child Support Agency have imposed by regulation on the number of items
that can be claimed.
According to their website at http://www.csa.gov.au/legal/page4.htm
the list includes the following items:
One could be forgiven for thinking this regulation has become more of an
effort to support the payee parent than the children directly.
We find it strange that the the Department of Social Security Policy and
Legislation guidelines show a far more extensive list than that allowed under
the CSA.
DSS uses the list to calculate non-cash payments given to a parent . The
monetary value is then used to reduce the amount the government
has to pay in 'family allowance'. So it is obviously acceptable to have a
large extensive list, when it saves the government money, but not so
when the paying parent might find some relief. Yet the same 'family allowance'
that is reduced under the DSS list is the same one that is reduced according
to the amount paid by the paying parent .
You can view and download the scanned version of this DSS page.
Click here and use your back
button to return.
We have it on good authority that Robin Poke,
the spokesperson for CSA, who was quoted in the Canberra Times article
was quite put out and said that if he known "he was dealing with MRA then
he would have given different answers". Really!
We'll be fascinated to find out the answers he
would have given and why!
Ed, MRA
List of items that may be used as non-cash maintenance
for the purpose of reducing family allowance payments, according to
DSS.