CSA booed and jeered!
A report from an observer who attended a Child Support Agency Information
Meeting held at the Camden Civic Centre on Thursday evening February 1, 2001.
Anyone who doubts whether the Child Support Agency is a deeply despised
institution should have attended the public information night the Agency
held at Camden Civic Centre.
What was telling about the irate crowd of more than 150 citizens was not
only that it was roughly equally divided between men and women, but across
a pretty broad social spectrum. All they had in common was they loved their
children and hated the CSA. From the man who was told not to use so much
petrol driving to work to the second wife who wants to know why her children
are worth nothing while the CSA drives her husband to the wall.
The two-hour meeting began with an information session, which most people
could have done without. A Legal Aid lawyer, Jane Weber, who did not get
a good reception, proudly announced that they now had millions of more taxpayer
dollars to play with, and then freely acknowledged that they usually only
fund the payee parents, in other words women against men in most instances!
The first man to ask a question said he found the CSA's slogan "helping parents
manage their responsibilities very demoralising after first being ripped
off by the Family Court. He was roundly applauded. Agency Manager, Karina
Murray and a panel of bureaucrats struggled to answer questions on why the
Agency has taken it compensation policy off its web site or why it refuses
to comply with the latest and most thorough analysis on the costs of children.
Just because you have laws and procedures doesn't mean they are actually
fair," said one dad.
The meeting went rapidly downhill for the CSA. One man repeatedly described
them as "reprehensible" was loudly applauded by both men and women alike.
Child Support just doesn't care", said one mother.
There were a string of moving stories; the Agency threatening to sell people's
assets; the struggle of bringing up children; the crippling of small businesses
as a result of huge financial imposts.
John Fahey, Minister for Finance unable to attend sent his assistant. Saying
she understood that "there are men who are desperate" Fahey's assistant took
extensive notes and promised to report the contents of the meeting to John
Fahey and Larry Anthony.
The second wives were particularly vocal. "Let these people get on their
feet," said one. "I carry my partner so he can have a life."
Another man shouted "You people don't live in the real world. Can't you see
these people are hurting?"
The Agency once again refused to release the statistics on how many of its
clients are dying or suiciding, believed to be in the order of 3 a day. It's
a simple question, of the 33,000 people who exit the scheme each year, how
may are doing so in a coffin?
The CSA's refusal to release this figure, a vital piece of information which
would tell us a great deal about the state of family law in Australia today
is a scandal.